Issue 32392 - Footnotes are not included in Alphabetical Index
Summary: Footnotes are not included in Alphabetical Index
Status: CONFIRMED
Alias: None
Product: Writer
Classification: Application
Component: ui (show other issues)
Version: OOo 1.1.2
Hardware: All All
: P3 Trivial with 29 votes (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: AOO issues mailing list
QA Contact:
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2004-08-01 09:06 UTC by olve
Modified: 2013-08-07 14:38 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: ENHANCEMENT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description olve 2004-08-01 09:06:51 UTC
When building an alphabetical index, the text of footnotes is not searched. In 
critical editions, the footnotes may contain important information which is not 
included in the main text, and it is therefore crucial that footnotes (which may 
take up over 90% of the page some times) also be indexed.
Comment 1 michael.ruess 2004-08-02 08:13:18 UTC
MRU->ES: please comment on this.
Comment 2 michael.ruess 2004-08-09 14:44:15 UTC
.
Comment 3 eric.savary 2004-08-09 15:10:51 UTC
ES->BH: the index entry dialog should be able to search in footnotes and in
frames too.
Comment 4 rma007 2007-03-28 11:30:45 UTC
Footnotes are not searched with sdi-file for concordance - not even in OOo 
2.0.3.
Your concordance algorithm is very fast and I'm working with ciritical editions 
too. So I would be very pleased to see this feature coming.
Comment 5 andrewwilcox 2009-02-11 21:41:59 UTC
This issue has a working "macro" solution within issue #98937.  I believe these
two issues should be addressed at the same time, and a fully robust solution
should be given to the alphabetic indexes.

I have done as much as I can so far, but there is a lot I don't know, as I have
only been doing OpenOffice macros for the last 2 weeks.  
Comment 6 nebbiolo 2009-12-18 23:29:18 UTC
using OOo 3.1.1
The concordance file skips the footnotes.
MsWord has no problem with the footnotes.
Comment 7 astrolabio 2010-02-13 16:33:36 UTC
Without this feature, it is impossible to index a long document with many 
footnotes
Please review:
1) The dialog-box (Click Insert > Indexes and Tables > Entry)
2) The concordance file
Comment 8 userwriter 2010-02-25 15:01:37 UTC
Please implemented this feature!
OOo writer indexing tools needs improvement.
Alphabetical index is CRUCIAL for academic use and publishing.
Creating a basic working index requires a small, but essential set of functions.
Missing one or more of these features severely affects the ability to create an
effective index.

I recommend reading this papaer (in particular pages 6 and 7)
http://www.allegrotechindexing.com/indexingtools.pdf

Issues very important 

Allowing more than one Alphabetical Index
http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6401

Footnotes are not included in Alphabetical Index
http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=32392

Alphabetical Indexes cross-reference
http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=104691

Index markers do not support cross references or bookmarks
http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=24250

Alphabetical index: allow marking pages as entry range even if the keyword
doesn't appear on every pages
http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=94565

A very interesting idea
Navigator should also list all Index Entries
http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61643
Comment 9 bettina.haberer 2010-05-21 14:58:25 UTC
To grep the issues easier via "requirements" I put the issues currently lying on
my owner to the owner "requirements". 
Comment 10 fh1970 2010-06-02 00:55:07 UTC
Is very important to correct this behavior.
Comment 11 pedrok 2010-06-10 05:53:21 UTC
Please i need this!
Would make my job much faster!
Comment 12 carlpaulooo 2010-06-19 16:34:12 UTC
Why Writer  has so many problems with the footnotes?
Comment 13 helmut_lothar 2010-06-19 23:45:19 UTC
Is not assigned to anyone this issue?
Helmut
Comment 14 oooalpha 2010-07-01 20:14:31 UTC
Proposal:
Page numbers for matter found in endnotes should be recorded like so: "206n 27";
for unnumbered or solitary footnotes, use this format: "206n, 212n." If the
entry appears in the text and in a footnote on the same page, "n" is not
necessary ("206," not "206n" or "206, 206n").
Comment 15 jrar77 2010-07-30 01:34:13 UTC
Only for the concordance file:
Instead of rewriting the concordance algorithm could add two new algorithms:
- one for Footnotes/Endnotes
- another for frames
A pop-up window to choose which algorithms to use:
- Body text (as it is now)
- Footnotes/Endnotes
- Frames

Maybe you can do with a Macro...
Comment 16 sandystw 2010-08-11 05:18:51 UTC
-> To: oooalpha
Excellent, as The Chicago Manual of Style!

If the page reference is in a note, the following convention is used:216n4 or
423nn4,5,6.“n” means “note”; “nn” means multiple notes on the same page.

http://cambridge.org/us/notesforauthors/general_indexing.pdf
(See page 5)
or
http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/ch18/ch18_toc.html
(Free 30 day trial)

Best of luck
Jonathan
Comment 17 holdsworth 2010-10-04 20:55:13 UTC
This is an annoying bug.
http://www.oooforum.org/forum/viewtopic.phtml?t=61597
Comment 18 mr80 2010-12-16 01:58:45 UTC
I. @oooalpha, @sandystw
Footnote-Endnote info in alphabetical index? Good idea!
http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59295
But it is off topic :)

II. Tips and Tricks, but does not work with the concordance file.
http://www.mail-archive.com/users@openoffice.org/msg17540.html
It can be done with a macro to the concordance file?

III. I suggest you sync the Find & Replace with indexing tools. So you could use
the research to paragraph styles, Regex, etc.

IV. Please see also
http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=88023