Apache OpenOffice (AOO) Bugzilla – Issue 96084
X && Y || Z, did we really mean to say that
Last modified: 2017-05-20 11:35:20 UTC
Confusion around precedence rules with X && Y || Z it is of course (X && Y) || Z but a common mistake is to believe it is X && (Y || Z)
tracker
Created attachment 57950 [details] demo mega patch, need to go through the subissue dodgy looking comparisons before locking-in existing meaning
OOo 3.2 is in showstopper phase. What's with this issue? It is targeted for OOo 3.2. Is it still valid for this target? If it isn't please change the target accordingly. Thx
Perhaps a more pertinent question is to follow up on the "fixed" issues here which are lingering in workspaces which don't look like they're ever going to see the light day :-)
set target 3.x since not relevant for 3.4 release.
Reset assigne to the default "issues@openoffice.apache.org".