Issue 92 - Installation failes 6.09
Summary: Installation failes 6.09
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of issue 27
Alias: None
Product: Installation
Classification: Application
Component: code (show other issues)
Version: 609
Hardware: PC Linux, all
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Unknown
QA Contact: issues@www
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2000-11-04 10:05 UTC by issues@www
Modified: 2003-12-06 14:52 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Attachments
Strace output when running soffice as regular user (163.93 KB, text/plain)
2003-12-06 14:52 UTC, issues@www 		no flags Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description issues@www 2000-11-04 10:05:55 UTC 
I installed OO 6.09 as root with /net switch in /usr/local/openoffice60
Everything went ok.

Then as a regular user I ran soffice in /usr/local/openoffice60/program.
I installed a regular ws installation.

Then as user I started soffice in /program or in ~/.openoffice and the
repair/deinstall dialog comes up. I can't start soffice!

I have RH 7.0 with all upgrades applied + HelixCode.
I use kernel 2.4.0-test10 ( I think that is the problem).

I have strace output if anyone wants to see...

Unfortunately I can't try the installation on a 2.2 kernel...


/Richard
Comment 1 issues@www 2000-11-04 10:07:02 UTC 
Created attachment 13 [details]
Strace output when running soffice as regular user
Comment 2 issues@www 2000-11-05 16:50:12 UTC 
Same thing with OO605.

I presume now that it is a 2.4.* thing...

/Richard
Comment 3 issues@www 2000-11-07 12:30:59 UTC 
No it isn't I got a mail from one user claiming to use 2.2.* kernel.


/Richard
Comment 4 stx123 2000-11-07 13:16:38 UTC 
Please check the bug database before submitting.
see also
http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/source/release_notes_609.html

Thanks
Stefan

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 27 ***
Comment 5 michael.bemmer 2003-03-11 17:25:34 UTC 
As mentioned on the qa dev list on March 5th I will close all resolved duplicate
issues. Please see this posting for details. First step in IssueZilla is
unfortunately to set them to verified.
Comment 6 michael.bemmer 2003-03-11 17:55:31 UTC 
As mentioned on the qa dev list on March 5th I will close all resolved duplicate
issues. Please see this posting for details.